Sunday, 8 January 2012


Posted: 07 Jan 2012 12:29 PM PST
The cost to the state of scrapping the UK Independent Living Fund (ILF) 
will be over 154 million pounds per year[i] in institutional costs based on 
current levels of 21,000 people that receive ILF. If we accept that a further 
41,000 people would have been entitled to receive ILF since it closed its 
doors to new applicants in June 2010 the figure rises to a minimum of over 
462 million.

The Independent Living Fund (ILF) allows ‘severely disabled’ people to stay 
in their own homes and out of residential institutions through the employment 
of personal assistants. The likely closure of ILF in 2015 for existing applicants 
will cause more misery to disabled people and cost the state billions with many 
disabled people being forced into residential institutions. The cost to the state 
of scrapping ILF is likely to top over 462 million pounds per year in institutional 
costs. These figures do not include the loss to the exchequer of tax revenues 
disabled people generate by employing personal assistants, nor extra health 
service costs that will be incurred by the closure of ILF.

While the Dilnot report suggested that individuals would pay a percentage of 
their own institutional costs in the future, the majority of disabled people will 
simply be unable to do that. Therefore the cost goes to the state or more 
specifically the tax payer. The stated purpose of the closure of ILF is claimed 
to be cost savings, yet figures based on potential predictions show the opposite 
will be true.

The government’s own social care health committee say: ‘Inevitably the cost 
of care is not static, 2011 figures had increased by 5.1% and 3.3% respectively 
from 2010. Many care homes can cost more than £50,000 per year’. However, 
given the loss of ILF and restrictions on many local authority eligibility criteria to 
‘critical’ to be eligible for social services – more and more disabled people will find 
their living, economic and social conditions deteriorating with additional adverse 
effects on their health.

A reliable 2010 residential cost estimate is given in the Scottish governments’ 
quoted estimate of £72,000 per year based on ‘Service User A’ who is ‘a 59 year 
old male who has multiple sclerosis’.  The cut backs on ILF, Disability Living 
Allowance , incapacity benefit changeovers and cuts in local authority funds of 
up to 30% make it more likely that this particular ‘service user’ and others like 
him will be heading for the more expensive option of the residential home.

Service user A is 59 and would be in residential ‘care’ for a number of years, 
based on the average life-span arrived at by the governments’ own Office of 
National Statistics. The cost to the state would amount to 15 million one 
hundred and twenty thousand over the lifetime of ‘service user A’ at 2010 
prices.

The government appear intent on contravening article 19 of the UN Convention 
on the Rights of Disabled Persons to live independently in the community with 
the right to employ personal assistants, as well as the European Convention on 
Human Rights and the diluted Equality Act 2010. The stated purpose of the 
closure of ILF is claimed to be cost savings, yet the figures show the opposite 
is true.

£37,888 per annum per person is the difference between receiving current 
average payout of ILF at 2011 and the cost of residential care at 2010 cost 
levels, excluding future inflation and excluding revenue from tax receipts of 
personal assistants employed by disabled people using ILF.

154 million two hundred thousand per year costs are based on the current 
number of 21,000 users of ILF@ £74,000 per year in institutional costs per 
person.  ILF has been closed to new applicants since June 2010. The overall 
figure of those in the qualifying bracket for ILF is likely to be far higher than 
the figure of 21,000 people stated by the coalition.

The Closure of the Independent Living Fund has been eclipsed by arguments 
on the change from Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence 
Payments, Atos and the Work Capability Assessment and Welfare reform as 
the priorities. That’s a lot for UK disability activists to fight, but it’s time to 
bring back the closure of ILF and its impacts.

Sign Disabled People against Cuts (DPAC’s) letter on ILF here

 Originally posted on http://www.digitalvoice.eu/


[i] Figure based on a cost of 74,000 per year for institutional costs
Posted: 07 Jan 2012 12:22 PM PST

 
 
No going back to Dickensian days – defend benefit rights, stop evictions
 
Vigil & lobby of Parliament
 
1pm Wed 11 January
Oppose the Welfare Reform Bill & benefit caps.  
Cap greedy landlords, not low-income people!
 
Meet opposite Parliament – Lords’ entrance 
Abingdon St SW1
 
All Welcome
 
On 11 January, the Lords’ debate on the Welfare Reform Bill continues.  
The Bill threatens basic entitlement to housing and other benefits – a 
roof over our heads. 

Benefit cap of £500 a week including rent: larger families including 
those with informally-fostered children, single mother families, households 
with disabled people, families of colour more likely to be on lower incomes – 
face eviction from central London and other cities if the cap goes through.  
For more see here.

The housing benefit cap is already forcing people to go without food 
and heating to pay the rent, or into unbearable overcrowding. Like in the 
US , people will end up homeless, destitute, begging and on the street.

The Social Fund relied on to furnish a new home or cope with emergencies – 
children coming back from care, women fleeing domestic violence, people 
coming out of hospital and prison – is being abolished.  People won’t be able 
to start a new life or escape a violent relationship; they’ll be at the mercy of 
loan sharks.

Disabled children and adults face all-round cuts: to disability benefits, 
benefit additions and concessions – a return to hardship and charity.

Child Benefit– which all mothers earn and all children need – will be taken 
from the poorest families by the benefit cap.

Income Support, which recognises the contribution of mothers and other 
carers, is being abolished and replaced with back-to-work conditions as soon 
as the child turns one.

Protest forced the government to drop plans to cut mobility money for people 
living in residential homes.  But other cuts to disabled children and adults are 
still in the Bill.  On 14 December, after lobbying and testimony from people 
affected, the Lords defeated government moves to cut housing benefit by 
£12-22 a week for Council tenants who have a spare room.

Come and raise your concerns on 11 January.  Bring placards with your 
organisation’s name and issues you are concerned about. Lobby the Lords – 
support amendments to keep Child Benefit out of the benefit cap, extend 
concessions for women fleeing domestic violence, ensure immediate benefit 
payments for people coming out of prison, and Zacchaeus 2000 amendments 
to protect claimants from unliveable benefit repayments, sanctions and bailiffs  -  
Lobby your MP; contact them to make an appointment or write to them about 
your personal situation – find your MP here.  

If you are unable to come on the day, ring them or write, for Lords’ addresses 
see here; and sign the epetition here.

For more info about the day, contact 
SMSD and the Zacchaeus 2000 Trust

0207 482 2496 

07961177889


No comments: